ROSIE THE RIVETER AND HER CONTRIBUTION TO WWII Essay

I. INTRODUCTION The role of women in American history has evolved a great deal over the past few centuries. In less than a hundred years, the role of women has moved from housewife to highly paid corporate executive to political leader. As events in history have shaped the present world, one can find hidden in such moments, pivotal points that catapult destiny into an unforeseen direction. This paper will examine one such pivotal moment, fashioned from the fictitious character known as ‘Rosie the Riveter’ who represented the powerful working class women during World War II and how her personification has helped shape the future lives of women. II. BODY To understand the significant changes within the role of women, it’s important to†¦show more content†¦Clearly the role of women reflected one of diminished value as compared to her male companion. But that was all about to change with the onset of World War II. During World War II the United States began to manufacture war materials to support its allies through lucrative government defense contracts as automobile factories like Ford and General Motors put aside their usual business operations and began to produce tanks and airplanes, shipyards too expanded their operations . The demand for war equipment naturally increased the demand for labor and as a result helped pull the American economy out of the grips of the Great Depression. Then as the unthinkable happened, on December 7, 1941, Japan bombed Pearl Harbor, which drew many young American men into the battlefield. As young men responded to their call of duty and enlisted in the armed services, this left the American war industry with a severe labor shortage. With so few men left to satisfy the labor needs, a call went out to women to fill this void. However, the initial response to this request was not satisfactory . As a result, the government devised a propaganda enriched advertising campaign to motivate the masses of women by appealing to their sense of patriotism as well as telling women their labor efforts would help end the war and bring soldiers home moreShow MoreRelatedFeminine Mystique12173 Words   |  49 PagesSupplemental Reading for US History 2 From Rosie to Lucy Questions students must answer in a 500-word (minimum) essay: 1) Describe the post-WWII frustrations felt by women such as Betty Friedan. 2) During the era of â€Å"Rosie the Riveter†, what gains did women make in the workforce? How did these women feel about themselves and their contributions? What did society as a whole think? 3) What role did mass media play during the 1950s and 1960s in regard to supporting or undermining the

Boy in Striped Pajamas Free Essays

BOY IN THE STRIPED PYJAMAS – TOPIC 2 In the novel Boy in The Striped Pyjamas, prejudice and discrimination are shown to have many negative effects on many of the characters such as Bruno, Shumel, Father, Mother and Kotler. In my essay I will explore this idea in relation to the novel. Discrimination, (or in other words negatively putting someone down but not physical hurting or touching them in anyway) is taken place in Boy in The Striped Pyjamas by many different people such as Gretel, by following Kotler’s decisions Gretel is discriminating because she is supporting the Germans belief. We will write a custom essay sample on Boy in Striped Pajamas or any similar topic only for you Order Now Prejudice on the other hand, (is another word for negative physical contact such as kicking, hitting or even killing) in Boy in Striped Pyjamas this is shown by the Father, Hitler. Also Kotler beating up Pavel over he had miss poured the wine. One of the most obvious examples of discrimination in this novel is the concentration camp and the negative effect it has on the Jewish prisoners. The fence that is separating Bruno and Shumel is there for a reason because of race, religion and culture. Shumel is living in fear, depression and is slowly emaciated, not only does he feel sad and isolated it is how he has been treated. In the book the writer says that Bruno looks and Shumel and ‘He stares at the floor and looking as if he was trying to convince his soul not to live inside his tiny body anymore’ he sits there in the rough dirty ground. Pavel is the butler at Bruno’s house and is also a Jew, like Shumel. When Bruno hurts himself on the tire swing he comes across Pavel and learns a bit about him. That he was a doctor but then got taken into the concentration camp and got everything taken away from him his clothes, family and food. Bruno was surprised and puzzled. Later on when Kotler comes to Bruno’s house form dinner Kotler gets mad at a conversation they were having and his temper rises. Kotler ask’s Pavel for wine, he had become weak and was trembling and limping a fair amount, Pavel he spills the wine all over Kotler and end up with Pavel in a serious condition. Despite the more powerful position of the Germans, the discrimination that takes place in the novel affects all the characters negatively. Mother is afraid of the concentration camp being too close to the house and is scared of the terrifying consequences it could, and did lead to. When Bruno and Shumel knew more about each other and realised that they weren’t meant to be friends but they looked further than that. Once Bruno and Shumel became greater friends Shumel asked Bruno a favour, to come over that side of the fence to find Shumel’s father. When Bruno accepts and goes ahead with it they get in trouble and get cramped in tightly by groups of 100’s and 100’s of adults they get sucked into the gas chamber and Bruno and Shumel die. The act of discrimination and prejudice ultimately led to the death of Bruno and Shumel’s life. Father, Hitler and Kotler were the three main prejudice leaders in this novel Father the commandant directing the soldiers to complete the ‘The Final Solution’ led to death for all Jews and sadly Bruno and Shumel as well. Father never felt the same way again he felt guilty that they had taken away so many lives, innocent lives and couldn’t even imagine how so many of them felt like that for most of their lives. Mother wasn’t happy about the decision in the first place and felt unsecure about the whole Out-with thing, she knew it would end up to something bad but did expect it like that. By the end of the novel Father was shocked, distressed and very heartbroken about Bruno’s death and realised that he hadn’t taken much notice of Bruno till then. When the soldiers took him away, because he wasn’t doing his job properly he didn’t care what they did or where going to do all he cared about was Bruno and his Family. Eventually they all moved back to Berlin after a few weeks, which was also not much different because of grandmother, but they couldn’t handle the pain in Out-with. But no matter where they are in the world, they will never forget about Bruno, ever. How to cite Boy in Striped Pajamas, Essay examples

Knowledge Management and Organizational Culture System

Question: Discuss about the Knowledge Management and Organizational Culture System. Answer: Introduction Abbas, Hanif (2012) defines Knowledge Management as the systematic processes governing the creation, dissemination, and utilization of knowledge. According to Forst (2012), knowledge management entails conveying of the right knowledge to the right person. Knowledge management is an essential tool in the growth and development of every organization. For knowledge management to be effective, it needs to be well coordinated with the organizational culture which is unique in every organization (Shafei Laveh, 2012). The culture of the organization is essential in knowledge management since understanding and meaning of events is different and unique in every organization. Like other organizations banks, have their culture which protects the banking ethics. The banking culture guides the staff to behave and work towards the attainment of their goals with ease (Shamsabadi, 2014). Knowledge management can be used to influence interaction patterns among the members of the organization and en hance its competition in the market through the creation of an appropriate organizational culture (Sadeghiet.al, 2011). According to Mueller, (2012), organizational culture hold is what unites the organization. Organization culture and knowledge management are linked. Knowledge management is influenced by organizational culture this is because knowledge management primarily relies on the interaction of the members of the organization (Cardoso et al. 2010). According to Mueller (2012), the organizational culture can be changed by knowledge management due to a close relationship that exists in these concepts of any organization. Literature review on knowledge management and organizational culture The organizational culture has an impact on the process of knowledge management. Hokzisinki Buchaman (2001) defined organizational culture as a common set of values, beliefs, customs, traditions and sustainable practices passed to the members of the organization. The organization culture guides the common conducts and practices of the staff, which makes them unique from other organizations (Shafei Laveh, 2012). Schein, (2010) also notes that organizational culture is unique and it is difficult to change in any organization. According to Khoramkhah et.al (2013), in their study on how organizational culture affects knowledge management, they found that there are four aspects of organizational culture, that is, work, consistency, adaptability, and mission had a significant relationship with knowledge management, but adaptability had the greatest relationship and influence. Rezaie K et.al (2014) researched on organizational culture and knowledge management a case study of Islamic Azad University and determined the contribution of adaptability, participation, flexibility and mission which are components of organization culture and knowledge management Raquel Daniel (2011) reviewed and analyzed the types of organizational cultures which enhance creativity and found that organizational culture can be used to confirm creativity technique clearly. Chung Wen (2012) in his study on performance and intellectual capital of biotech companies discovered that there was a relationship between technological innovation and financial performance. According to Bedford (2013,) more often, organizational culture fails to agree with individual effort. This is because consists of often ignored assumptions and shared meanings shared through participation in the organization (Ajmal Koskinen, 2008). Ajmal Koskinen further argues that cultural factors rather than technological oversights mostly lead to failure of knowledge transfer systems. This, therefore, can lead to failure of the knowledge management system. According to Ajmal Koskinen (2008), the firms ability to manage knowledge effectively depends on how culture relates knowledge creation process. Ajmal Koskinen believed that a successful knowledge management could only be achieved through establishing a supportive culture while developing knowledge management systems. Knowledge can only be transferred through sharing; this can only be facilitated by a shared organizational culture which influences individuals perception of owning knowledge and make him share it with others (Tan et al., 2009). The similarity of values and a common set up of sharing knowledge based on experiences and academic knowledge determines how information is shared in an organization (Foss, Husted Michailova 2010). The meanings and values that the members of the organization attach to knowledge management systems is influenced by individual assumptions which make up organizational culture (Schein 2010) The leverage of organizational refinement on knowledge management process is evident since it affects the employees behavior. Organizational culture is a critical aspect of knowledge creation, storage, transfer and application (Ajmal Koskinen, 2008). According to Smith (2013), Knowledge Management system refers to an information recording system in an organization where every member of the organization can retrieve the information. Forst (2010) describes knowledge managements systems as any IT system used for; storing information where it can easily be retrieved, its source located and enhances collaboration in the organization. Types of knowledge management systems (KMS) Gupta Sharma (2004) categorized knowledge management systems into six categories as follows; Expert systems- a system used in making choices where every person is involved and not only the experts. Groupware- these are systems used to enhance teamwork among the members of an organization through sharing of appointments or messages. Document management systems- used for designing, storing, sharing and searching documents, therefore, increasing efficiency. Decision Support systems- used in communicating to users in a way that will enhance proper decisions. Data Management Systems- they are systems that are used to gather information and store it in a database for easier retrieval. Simulation Systems- these are systems used to model reality and testing effects of unsafe scenarios or uneconomical to perform with their real world equivalents. Benefits of using knowledge management systems Knowledge management systems enhance better distribution of knowledge through increased sharing of information. Information that was only known by one worker can be made known to the rest of the people in the organization (Smith, 2013). The systems provide a platform for learning which increases the knowledge base of the organization. Knowledge management systems lead to improved accuracy and consistency of information. Thisisattributedto the fact that all members of the organization can access and contribute to the internal knowledge base. Sharing knowledge leads to increased employee satisfaction. This is because the workers with knowledge, desire to share that knowledge which they have and is attached to them. Knowledge management systems save on time because less time spent on looking for answers. This is attributed to a central database with powerful search functions which makes it easier for members of the organization to retrieve. The systems also enable new workers to adopt easily in an organization since there is a rich source of information at their disposal. This helps them to easily access answers to questions they may be having about the organization. At some point, employees may leave the organization, in such scenarios, knowledge management systems help in retaining knowledge which the organization has acquired from them. The knowledge is captured and stored and can easily be retrieved even when the owner leaves the organization. The system, therefore, prevents loss of important information. Introduction KMS faces some challenges in the organization. Botha et al. (2008) stress that there is need to understand what knowledge management systems cannot do. He argues that by introducing these systems, it does not guarantee knowledge sharing among the experts, other initiatives have to be outsourced and implemented. Below are some of the reasons why Knowledge management systems fail; Failure of the management and technicians to support the implementation and use of the systems. Considering technology to be a knowledge management by itself. Failure to recognize the exact need of an organization. Inadequate knowledge on the functions of specific knowledge management systems. Lack of a defined organizational culture making them not to accept the systems. Lack of proper management measures. How KMS systems can be implemented successfully Successful implementation of KMS systems has three stages; adoption, acceptance, and assimilation (Hecht et al. (2011).Hecht et al. identified three sets of factors affecting KMS stages of implementation. They came up with the model below for implementing KMS. According to Hecht et al.(2011), the adoption stage of implementing KMS is faced with several challenges such as cultural values, and commercial advantage among others. To successfully adopt KMS, one needs to; Analyze the organization internally. Evaluate knowledge needs, lines and communication and the community where it will be practiced. Come up with ways to improve the status of the organization by evaluating the work practices in the organizations. According to Botha et (2008), tacit knowledge leads to decreased need for high-tech solutions. Hecht et al. (2011) outlined the following factors that influence acceptance of KMS systems; anxiety, ease of use, motivation, social factors among others. Acceptance of KMS systems can be promoted through; Giving a chance for the user to participate in designing and implementation when possible. Allow the users to take part in the evaluation of the system when need Ensure the system is easy to use for the users by being highly intuitive (Frank 2002). Ensuring that there is enough technical and managerial support (Frost 2010) Use product experts in promoting the system in the entire organization (Frost 2010) According to Hecht et al. (2011), the assimilation stage of KMS is facing challenges like inadequate knowledge, lack of managerial support, high costs incurred and willingness of the organization members to work together. They suggested the following ways by which assimilation of KMS can be promoted by: Keeping the content relevant through regular updating, revising among other processes. The managements should be able to convince the users the advantage of using the system (Gamble and Blackwell, 2011) Ensuring that effective budgeting is done to ensure successful implementation of the system. Collaboration should be the main focus of implementing the KMS system. Management should be involved throughout the implementation process of the system. Critical discussion on Knowledge management and organizational culture in Sepah Bank in Yadz City Sarmadi, et al. (2015) in their study on whether organizational culture, knowledge management, and intellectual capital relate, they found that there was a close relationship between organization culture and knowledge management. They found that organizational culture had a direct positive impact on knowledge management. This suggests that a change in the organization culture can be done through changing the interaction patterns of people in the organization.This will help the bank to have a competitive advantage over others. The study illustrates the importance of organizational culture which sepah bank should put into consideration. For there to be an effective knowledge management system, the management should ensure that measures are taken for the organizational culture to favor the implementation of Knowledge Management systems. Sarmadi, et al. (2015) also found that knowledge management has a significant impact on intellectual capital. These results put emphasis on the importance of knowledge management which the managerial system of the bank should put into consideration. This calls for a need to increase the wealth of information available to the staff in the organization. The results from this study, also indicate that organizational culture positively affects intellectual capital.The Bank managerial system should consider building a better organizational culture which will enhance improved sharing of information. The study shows significant relationships between the three aspects which are, organizational culture, knowledge management, and intellectual capital. However, organizational culture seems to be the central aspect with a positive impact on both knowledge management and intellectual capital. This indicates that for effective knowledge management, the organization must consider creating a conducive culture that encourages sharing of information among members of the organization. Conclusion Knowledge management is vital to every organization. It enhances the growth of the organization and determines how well it can compete with other organizations in a similar line of production. However, knowledge management depends heavily on the organizational culture. The organization should consider the impact that organizational culture has on knowledge management and try to build a strong culture which embraces sharing of information among all the members of the organization. The management should be supportive in the implementation of Knowledge Management systems. It is important to encourage participation by all members of the organization including the junior workers. The Knowledge management systems implemented by the organizations should be easy to access and use for all the members of the organization. References Ajmal, M. and Koskinen, K., (2008). Knowledge transfer in project-based organizations: an organizational culture perspective,Project Management Journal, Vol. 39 No. 1, pp. 7-15. Bedford, D., (2013). A case study in knowledge management education historical challenges and future opportunities,Electronic Journal of Knowledge Management, Vol. 11 No. 3, pp. 199-213. Botha, et al., (2008). Description: The Knowledge Management Process Model. Available at: https://www.innovators.edu.pk/node/220 Cordoso, L et al (2012). Knowledge Management and its Critical factors in in social Economy organizations. Journal of knowledge management, 16(2) Foss, N, Husted. K Michailova S (2010). Governing knowledge sharing in organizations: levels of analysis, governance mechanisms, and research directions. Journal of management studies, 2010. 47(3) Frost, A., (2010).Knowledge Management from A to Z: Knowledge management systems. Available from: https://www.knowledge-management-tools.net/ Hecht et al. (2011) Fostering adoption, acceptance, and assimilation in knowledge management system design. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/220866471_Fostering_adoption_acceptance_and_assimilation_in_knowledge_management_system_design Khoramkhah, H., et al., (2013).The Impact of Organizational Culture on K Knowledge Management. Journal of Knowledge Management, Issue 19 Lin, Y. and Dalkir, K., (2010). Factors affecting KM implementation in the Chinese community,International Journal of Knowledge Management, Vol. 6 No. 1, pp. 1-22. Mueller, J. (2012). The interactive relationship of corporate culture and knowledge management: a review. Review of managerial science, 6(2) Reddy, N., (2013).Types of Knowledge Management systems. Available from:https://www.slideshare.net/k_nitin_r/types-of-knowledge-management-systems Rezaie, K. et al., (2014) Studying the relationship between organizational culture and knowledge management in Islamic Azad University, Sari Branch and determining the contribution of each component: Quarterly Journal of New Approach in Educational Administration V(1) Sarmadi, H et al., (2015).Examining the relationship between organizational culture, knowledge management and intellectual capital (Case study: Branches of Sepah Bank in Yazd City). Adv. Environ. Bio, 9(2), 54-64 2014 Shafei, R Laveh, (2012). The study of the influence of organizational culture and its relationship to foster knowledge management, knowledge workers and its relationship with fostering knowledge employees in government agencies in Western Azerbaijan province; studies in management. 16(3): 131-151 Shamsabadi, M., (2014).Understanding the components of organizational culture.Journal of Economics world. Vol XII Sadeghi, An et al., (2011). The relationship between organizational culture and knowledge management component, Case study: Shahid Hashemi Nejad Hospital in Tehran. Journal of the hospital, 10(2) Smith, C., (2013). What is a Knowledge Management System? Available from: https://www.dzonesoftware.com/blog/what-is-knowledge-management Tan, N. et al., (2009). Trust: facilitator of knowledge-sharing culture, Journal of Communications of the IBIMA (CIBIMA ), Vol. 7 No. 15, pp. 137-142.